2 comments

  • swingandamiss 2 hours ago
    > hypotheses as to why rates are rising in younger people, including processed foods, higher obesity rates, and certain infections

    Lack of moving/walking with long periods of sitting, being overweight, no fruits or vegetables and too much highly processed food/junk. It appears to be somewhat self inflicted, but it's hard to live a better life for most as the above is just the norm now.

    • gwbas1c 34 minutes ago
      It's too early to jump to conclusions, it could be anything: A chemical used in bottles (for babies), traces of a chemical in infant formula, something in toothpaste, medicine, ect.

      Given the rise in colon cancer in middle-aged adults, I suspect the two (teenage and middle aged colon cancer) are related.

      The most ironic would be if it's caused by trace amounts of a fancy new pesticide used on a less-popular fruit or vegtable.

    • kelseyfrog 24 minutes ago
      Is this medical advice?
    • EA-3167 1 hour ago
      Those are certainly factors, but it’s madness to think they’re the only ones. We live in an increasingly polluted world, we truly don’t know what the long-term impact of ubiquitous microplastic, PFAS, and so on has. I’m sure increasingly unhealthy and low fiber diets don’t help, but I’d be skeptical of that as a full “explanation”.

      Sometimes trends occur due to complex circumstances we can’t pin down exactly, and it’s wildly unhelpful to pretend that you have a solution to a problem that boils down to, “wwweellllll they did it to themselves I guess.”

    • therealpygon 43 minutes ago
      Ah yes. Kids are getting cancer “because they are fat and lazy”. How quaint.
    • williamtell 1 hour ago
      Sure but it is rather paradoxical as healthy lifestyle things are far more available like every other consumer option. There's just the higher probability of choosing the more immediately satisfying new choices and/or of envying those who do.
      • estearum 1 hour ago
        “System prefers lower-energy state” is not paradoxical at all.

        It’s just about the most fundamental law in the entire universe, in fact.

        • williamtell 56 minutes ago
          I didn't say what people prefer is a paradox. There is more availability and use of health related choices that violate this "law" but much more use of things that satisfy it. It would take a hell of a lot of healthy living to make up for cancer rates in 10% of the population having all the options and a dopamine addiction. Pretty remarkable the cancer rates are as low as they are.
  • Aboutplants 1 hour ago
    How much of an impact does sitting for hours on end effect your risk of colon cancer? I’m not talking about lack of exercise but the physical act of sitting for 6+ hours a day, regardless of whether you get “adequate” exercise?

    As someone with Crohn’s disease, I am sensitive to sitting for extended periods and its impact on my internals near my end. I’m sure there is some sort of effect, just curious if there has been any research

    • peterbecich 56 minutes ago
      Has this factor really changed much in the past century?
    • Fire-Dragon-DoL 1 hour ago
      Same question: I exercise and eat healthy, but I sit for long stretches
      • onemoresoop 1 hour ago
        It's probably not too healthy to sit for too long. If unavoidable, eg. in schools, best thing is to periodically stand up for a while before contining with more sitting...
        • Fire-Dragon-DoL 30 minutes ago
          No I work from home and could definitely get up, but when I get in the zone I literally forget, and getting up is often detrimental to my focus.

          Doesn't mean I can't do anything for it though.