6 comments

  • cozzyd 19 minutes ago
    I was involved in this analysis if anybody has questions (though the student and postdoc did most of the real work)
  • 4ndrewl 1 hour ago
    Just read the title and thought "Not now Cthulu, we've got enough going on"
    • sgbeal 28 minutes ago
      Whereas i was thinking "it's about time a hero arrived!" ;)

      i don't presume to know whether Cthulhu is the hero we need or the hero we deserve.

      • BLKNSLVR 25 minutes ago
        Definitely the one we deserve...
  • frereubu 56 minutes ago
    > With a new data release expected soon, covering all five ARA stations over several years, the ARA team now anticipates up to seven candidate neutrino events.

    I love the patience involved in this kind of science.

  • NoSalt 1 hour ago
    Is it just ice? I thought most neutrino detectors were large underground pools of water. I mean ... tomāto/tomăto, yes, but is solid water better than liquid water?
    • chris_va 1 hour ago
      The size of the detector can be very large, stable, and protected with an ice cap. https://icecube.wisc.edu/science/icecube/

      There aren't a lot of places with multiple km of water without things like animal life or other confounders.

      • NoSalt 48 minutes ago
        So, [controlled] liquid water is better but [controlled] solid water is more abundant?
        • chris_va 14 minutes ago
          I wouldn't say liquid is "better". The neutrinos don't care from a cross section standpoint.

          Uniformity of the light field is going to be different, but that is not my sub-domain.

          • cozzyd 0 minutes ago
            A liquid you control (and can densely instrument) is going to be a much easier to characterize detector than large volumes of natural material
    • cozzyd 16 minutes ago
      Depends on the energy scale involved!

      Higher energy = "easier" to detect (produce more light or radio emission), but the events are rarer so you want to build a bigger detector.

      There are also underwater pools of water being used :) (KM3Net,P-ONE, Baikal-GVD, etc.)

  • AnimalMuppet 1 hour ago
    Summary for those who won't fight through four blocking pop-ups to read the article:

    When a high-energy particle (cosmic ray, say) hits ice, it creates an interaction cascade. (Think of what the Fly's Eye experiment sees, but in ice.) That interaction cascade creates (among other things) a radio signal. This detector is a radio detector under Antarctic ice, looking for exactly that.

    The point is that, if a high-energy neutrino were to hit the ice, it could create the same kind of cascade, but it would make it much further into the ice. By having multiple detectors, they can pin down the location, and so they can try to tell the difference between "regular" cosmic rays and high-energy neutrinos.

    The detector seems to be functioning as designed. They have seven candidate neutrino interactions.

    • askl 1 hour ago
      I just turned off my ad blocker to see how bad it is. Because with it turned on I didn't see any popups.

      They have Google ads on their site promoting a paid ad free version of their site? WTF? Why would you pay google to put ads for on your site for your own service?

  • yards 59 minutes ago
    Pluribus, be careful